Scale and rural compatibility
The proposed acreage and industrial intensity are unusually large for a rural area of farms, forests, homes, and small communities.
The current proposal
What is publicly identified, what remains undisclosed, what the applicant proposes, and why residents are asking for closer review.
Project parties and filing facts
Unknown or incomplete items are labeled rather than guessed. The conceptual filing may change during review.
Why residents are concerned
Residents have raised concerns about the project’s cumulative, long-term effects and the amount of information still unavailable before a final decision.
The proposed acreage and industrial intensity are unusually large for a rural area of farms, forests, homes, and small communities.
Residents want independently reviewed load projections, upgrade responsibilities, rate protections, backup-generation details, and disclosure of who bears stranded-cost risk.
Questions remain about cumulative low-frequency sound, generator testing, emergencies, complaint response, continuous monitoring, and enforceable remedies.
Residents are asking how cooling, construction, impervious surface, erosion, runoff, floodplain limits, groundwater, and the Dan River will be protected over full buildout.
Backup power, construction activity, heat, emissions, and combined industrial burdens are among the health-related issues residents want analyzed before approval.
The surrounding landscape is tied to Saura history, Black farming communities, the Hairston and Bailey families, cemeteries, archaeology, and the county’s rural identity.
Residents want transparent calculations for tax revenue, jobs, incentives, depreciation, public-service costs, utility investments, and the timeline for reaching full buildout.
The end user, final building program, combined floor area, full power demand, construction phasing, and some operating details have not been publicly identified.
Proposed conditions matter only if they are measurable, independently verified, publicly reported, enforceable, and paired with effective remedies for noncompliance.
What residents can do now
Choose one action—or several—to help neighbors follow the record and participate in the public process.
Add your name to Protect Stokes County! Reject Project Delta!
Take this step ↗See the No Data Center in Walnut Cove petition and its community support.
Take this step ↗Call or email each member of the Stokes County Board of Commissioners.
Take this step →Check upcoming Board of Commissioners dates, agendas, and packets.
Take this step →Use the share button to send this page to people across Stokes County.
Send a message to the leaders of Stokes County Strong, Data Center Wrong.
Take this step →Passionate advocacy never justifies hateful rhetoric, harassment, threats, or political violence.
Read both the filing and the claims
Application, proposed conditions, buffer exhibit, conceptual site plan, meeting report, and parcel materials.
Open county materials ↗Project Delta’s website presents the developer’s benefits, commitments, FAQs, and economic projections.
Open developer website ↗Search official records, reporting, advocacy resources, planning documents, maps, petitions, and video links.
Search the library